The concept of leadership stretches beyond confines of time and geographical locations. Leadership has been conceptualized popularly as the ability of a person to influence a group of people with the intention of achieving a particular goal. Subordinate leadership entails bottom-top type of leadership. This kind of leadership is achieved by knowing and studying people with position and power while making them follow the leader in promoting his cause. This is the art of persuasion in working from below upwards. This leadership also entails the matching up of the proposal in a way that will convince the person above the leader in regard to authority and power. In doing so, you will be leading hence they will exercise their powers according to your undertakings. Subordinate leadership allows the subordinate to create followership from people with power and authority and in turn, helps the subordinate to achieve the desired objectives.
To ensure the success of this leadership, there is the need to watch, listen, and read people with authority, and apply imagination on their probable longings and wants. After satisfying their needs, there is the likely hood of them assists in achieving things the individual could not have done. There exists acknowledgement in extant literature that there is a strong relationship to policy implementation on public agencies and the kind of leadership style. The managerial effectiveness within the public agency can be attributed to the influence and the power of subordinates (Jonas, 2004). Subordinate leadership is paramount in running the public agency in that it takes into consideration the impact of situational constraints that may arise on the path of those with higher power and positions. In this regard, this kind of leadership is able to recognize and deal with role demands that are related to the level of leaders and the expectations of those higher in ranks.
According to Ashworth (2001), subordinate leadership is crucial in the relationship between those with authority and their subordinates hence the capability of accepting the opinions and views of the junior staff. Without some degree of strong subordinate and the application of this kind of leadership, it will be hard for the public agencies implement policies that concern the opinions of those under the jurisdiction. To ensure smooth running of the public agency, subordinate leadership brings the notion of togetherness and ensures that leadership does not run only from top to bottom.
The ideas relayed by the subordinates should also be considered hence influencing the people with power and authority into reconsidering what ought to be integrated into the public agency. A study, done by Kouzes and Posner (2010), states that the best leaders are always the best learners. This excerpt proves the importance of subordinate leadership within an agency in that the junior staff can convince the senior to accept his or her proposal in quest of achieving a particular objective. For a public office or an agency, to accommodate the diverse needs of the citizen, leaders should have a passion to learn from the subordinate; and this will open new experiences in feedback relaying and policy implementation. Subordinate leadership is useful in running a public agency from the aspect that it instills the norm of a growth mindset to those in the subordinate offices and the managers.
Most leadership styles, discussed in different books and journals, support the top-bottom leadership style. Contrary to this, subordinate leadership entails the bottom-up leadership which is characterized by the practice of deliberate consistency in improvement of public agencies. It is also evident in this kind of leadership that feedback on results should always be accompanied with a proposal and satisfaction to those with authority and power. Leading at the subordinate level can be challenging but with supportive managers; it can be easier and more productive hence achieving the desired organization's vision.